GigLookup

← Back to AI training work

Remotasks

What it is
Task-based AI training work
What you need
We haven't confirmed
How you get paid
We haven't confirmed
Worker costs
No upfront cost found — we searched their landing page and signup flow (the site publishes no pricing/FAQ subtree) on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
Taking new people
Yes
How we know
from job postings and worker reports, not an official page
Last checked by us
Aug 11, 2026
Where it works
from anywhere
How you get in
Sign up on their own site
Device you need
We haven't confirmed
Whether you can join right now
CLOSED TO NEW US SIGN-UPS as of 2026-08-13: their own signup page answered that they are not currently accepting new contributors from this location. They point the work to Outlier instead — which this directory carries as its own listing, so you can go straight there. This was checked from one US session on that date and is the kind of thing that reopens, so it is worth re-checking rather than treating as permanent
Company behind it
Scale AI
Sign-up link
https://www.remotasks.com/signup
Where this came from
Where we got this
ai-lane-package-v4.md Part 3.4 — Remotasks

Every claim on this card, traced — 9 claims:

Availability note read from the company's own page
owner rulings from the raw-log read (2026-08-13): read in a rendering browser 2026-08-13 — 'we aren't currently accepting new contributors from your location on Remotasks', with their own redirect to Outlier.ai. Cross-referenced to the Outlier record (id 59) this database already carries. LOCATION-CONDITIONAL and DATED: one US session, one day — not a proven global or permanent state
Company behind it unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Reported-community). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Cost picture read from the company's own page
money-pass2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): EVIDENCED ABSENCE — we read their landing page and signup flow (the site publishes no pricing/FAQ subtree) on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
How you get in read from the company's own page
browser-rendered pass (owner-approved 2026-08-13): their own signup page — the worker door, located in their own HTML during the static pass and READ in the browser — READ IN A RENDERING BROWSER 2026-08-13 (public page, no login, nothing circumvented)
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
browser-rendered pass (owner-approved 2026-08-13): their own signup page — the worker door, located in their own HTML during the static pass and READ in the browser — READ IN A RENDERING BROWSER 2026-08-13 (public page, no login, nothing circumvented)
Taking new people read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): RE-SOURCED FROM UNKNOWN: their own page, fetched this arc, carries an open application flow — the unknown resolved to taking-people on the source's own surface
Vehicle class read from the company's own page
category-vehicle-cascade (owner ruling 2026-08-25): CATEGORY DEFINITION — remote work is performed remotely — by definition, no vehicle is involved in doing it. Encoded at the category level by owner ruling; the record's own page remains the authority for everything else it states.
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): restates this record's category-definition vehicle encode under the five-state model — the work is remote, listing-and-shipping, or hosting your own asset; no transport is part of doing it (the vehicle_tier claim remains the underlying source)
What it is unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Reported-community). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.

See something wrong? Tell us.