GigLookup

← Back to Moving & labor help

TaskRabbit

Handyman/assembly/moving tasks

What it is
Task marketplace: assembly, mounting, moving, handyman
What you need
18+; background check
How you get paid
Hourly (you set rate)
Worker costs
Registration fee ~$25 — you pay this before you can earn anything, amount may have changed — check before you sign up
Working in Greater Cleveland now
We haven't confirmed — derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
Taking new people
Yes
How we know
the company says so — we haven't confirmed it ourselves
Last checked by us
Aug 25, 2026
Where it works
this metro area
How you get in
Sign up on their own site
Device you need
We haven't confirmed
Sign-up link
https://www.taskrabbit.com/become-a-tasker

What workers rate the app

The rating of the app workers use — never the customer app. Each store is its own witness; we show both and never average them. The count is what makes a score mean something. Click a listing to see the number as it stands today.

Apple App Store
Tasker by Taskrabbit — 3.1 from 4,344 ratings — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
Google Play
Tasker by Taskrabbit — 2.8 from 16.4K reviews — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
Where this came from
Where we got this
Tasker page
Worker costs, exactly as our source recorded it
Registration fee ~$25 — before-access, verify current

Every claim on this card, traced — 11 claims:

How you get in read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Tasker page', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
How you get paid read from the company's own page
debt-tranche3 (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own pages, fetched 2026-08-26: 'Before you book a Tasker you can see their hourly rate' — the tasker-set hourly rate is the model, on their own pages
Local operating status derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
mktcle-reclass (owner ruling 2026-08-26): STRUCTURALLY UNSOURCEABLE from provider property — companies do not state their metro lists, so no re-fetch can ever pay this claim. Reclassified out of the owed pile into the declared class: derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words.
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Tasker page', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
Taking new people read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): RE-SOURCED FROM UNKNOWN: their own page, fetched this arc, carries an open application flow — the unknown resolved to taking-people on the source's own surface
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase3 (owner arc 2026-08-25, pages fetched 2026-08-25): their own Tasker pages describe work performed at clients' homes; no vehicle requirement is stated anywhere on them
What it is read from the company's own page
debt-tranche2 (owner arc 2026-08-26): identity restated on their Tasker pages: assembly, mounting, moving, handyman (fetched 2026-08-26)
What workers rate the app reported by someone else — not the company's words
Apple App Store listing for "Tasker by Taskrabbit" and Google Play listing for "Tasker by Taskrabbit" — the store is the witness, not the company; checked 2026-09-02
What you need unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Claimed-provider). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Worker costs read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): the record's provider-cited cost detail carries the current story this field pointed at — re-sourced against that evidence (see worker_costs_detail)
Worker costs, in detail unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Claimed-provider). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.

See something wrong? Tell us.