GigLookup

← Back to Other shift & temp work

Wonolo

Warehouse/logistics shifts

What it is
On-demand shift staffing. From their own store listing: the shift categories named are warehousing, food production, merchandising and cleaning, and the pitch is to pick up shifts immediately and get paid on your own schedule
What you need
Varies
How you get paid
Hourly/daily shift
Worker costs
No upfront cost found — we searched their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
Taking new people
Yes
How we know
the company says so — we haven't confirmed it ourselves
Last checked by us
Aug 8, 2026
Where it works
this metro area
How you get in
Sign up on their own site
Device you need
We haven't confirmed
Sign-up link
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.wonolodroid

What workers rate the app

The rating of the app workers use — never the customer app. Each store is its own witness; we show both and never average them. The count is what makes a score mean something. Click a listing to see the number as it stands today.

Apple App Store
Wonolo — 4.8 from 36,435 ratings — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
Google Play
Wonolo — 4.3 from 19.2K reviews — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
Where this came from
Where we got this
Roundup

Every claim on this card, traced — 11 claims:

Cost picture read from the company's own page
money-campaign (owner arc 2026-08-25): EVIDENCED ABSENCE — we read their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free; an absence is only as strong as the search that looked for it, and this records the search.
How you get in read from the company's own page
doors-package-v19-group1.md: their own Google Play listing, package com.wonolodroid, developer 'Wonolo inc' — FETCHED 2026-08-13
How you get paid unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Claimed-provider). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Local operating status derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
mktcle-reclass (owner ruling 2026-08-26): STRUCTURALLY UNSOURCEABLE from provider property — companies do not state their metro lists, so no re-fetch can ever pay this claim. Reclassified out of the owed pile into the declared class: derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words.
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
doors-package-v19-group1.md: their own Google Play listing, package com.wonolodroid, developer 'Wonolo inc' — FETCHED 2026-08-13
Taking new people read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): RE-SOURCED FROM UNKNOWN: their own page, fetched this arc, carries an open application flow — the unknown resolved to taking-people on the source's own surface
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase4 (owner ruling 2026-08-25): on-site shift work at a business (warehouse/restaurant/hotel/event) per the record's own material; the worker carries themselves, and no vehicle is part of the work. Work-type basis under the ruled three-condition test; no quote fabricated.
What it is read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): the value's own internal citation names the provider surface it came from (a later arc wrote sourced content into a field whose claim level never flipped); that surface was fetched again this arc — the receipt is in the value and the fetch is dated 2026-08-26
What workers rate the app reported by someone else — not the company's words
Apple App Store listing for "Wonolo" and Google Play listing for "Wonolo" — the store is the witness, not the company; checked 2026-09-02
What you need unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Claimed-provider). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Worker costs read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): DROPPED TO HONEST ABSENCE: the inherited value was an unproven promise; the 2026-08-25 search of their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees found no fee statement, and the record now carries the evidenced absence instead

See something wrong? Tell us.