Credentialed-specialist AI work ([figure removed]); public listings board segmented by language and domain; 1099 contract role, no sponsorship
What you need
Credentials (higher tiers); many listings state a college degree is required — the bar varies per listing, not per platform
How you get paid
Hourly by specialty
Worker costs
No upfront cost found — we searched their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
They don't have their own sign-up page — they hire through job boards. Search current openings:
Titles are inconsistent — this is why people miss this work. Search the company name itself, and the kind of work in your own words; postings for the same job are often listed under several different titles.
Indeed — search the terms above directly on indeed.com (we don't link it: their bot check blocks direct links)
Company behind it read from the company's own page
debt-tranche2 (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own page title: 'Alignerr | Powered by Labelbox'
Cost picture read from the company's own page
money-pass2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): EVIDENCED ABSENCE — we read their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
How you get in read from the company's own page
Audit exclusion 2026-08-11: The v4 corrections arc verified Alignerr's public listings board on its OWN job board and made that board the access path, ratified by the owner. Only the record-level evidence_source string ('Worker comparisons') was stale, so the door is provider-sourced and stands.
How you get paid read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own page, fetched 2026-08-26: hourly pay stated ('Average pay' listed per hour)
Local operating status derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
mktcle-reclass (owner ruling 2026-08-26): STRUCTURALLY UNSOURCEABLE from provider property — companies do not state their metro lists, so no re-fetch can ever pay this claim. Reclassified out of the owed pile into the declared class: derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words.
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
Audit exclusion 2026-08-11: The v4 corrections arc verified Alignerr's public listings board on its OWN job board and made that board the access path, ratified by the owner. Only the record-level evidence_source string ('Worker comparisons') was stale, so the door is provider-sourced and stands.
Taking new people unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Verified-official). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Vehicle class read from the company's own page
category-vehicle-cascade (owner ruling 2026-08-25): CATEGORY DEFINITION — remote work is performed remotely — by definition, no vehicle is involved in doing it. Encoded at the category level by owner ruling; the record's own page remains the authority for everything else it states.
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): restates this record's category-definition vehicle encode under the five-state model — the work is remote, listing-and-shipping, or hosting your own asset; no transport is part of doing it (the vehicle_tier claim remains the underlying source)
What it is read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own page title/heading, fetched 2026-08-26, restates the description's core identity claim in the source's own words
What you need unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Verified-official). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Worker costs read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): DROPPED TO HONEST ABSENCE: the inherited value was an unproven promise; the 2026-08-25 search of their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees found no fee statement, and the record now carries the evidenced absence instead
You just opened their sign-up page. Was this one new to you? ✓ recorded
Optional. Answering doesn't affect the page you just opened.