GigLookup

← Back to Rent out what you own

Rent My Equipment (2Quip)

Rent out tools/equipment

What it is
P2P marketplace; ~10k items, 45 states claimed
What you need
Own equipment
How you get paid
Rental
Worker costs
No upfront cost found — we searched their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
Taking new people
Yes
How we know
the company says so — we haven't confirmed it ourselves
Last checked by us
Aug 8, 2026
Where it works
anywhere in the US
How you get in
Sign up on their own site
Device you need
We haven't confirmed
Sign-up link
https://www.rentmyequipment.com

What workers rate the app

The rating of the app workers use — never the customer app. Each store is its own witness; we show both and never average them. The count is what makes a score mean something. Click a listing to see the number as it stands today.

Google Play
Rent My Equipment — listed, no ratings yet — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02

One app serves both workers and customers here, so this rating blends both populations.

Where this came from
Where we got this
Own site

Every claim on this card, traced — 12 claims:

Cost picture read from the company's own page
money-pass2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): EVIDENCED ABSENCE — we read their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees on 2026-08-25 and found no upfront-cost language. Not a guarantee of free.
How you get in read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Own site', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
How you get paid unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Claimed-provider). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Local operating status derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
mktcle-reclass (owner ruling 2026-08-26): STRUCTURALLY UNSOURCEABLE from provider property — companies do not state their metro lists, so no re-fetch can ever pay this claim. Reclassified out of the owed pile into the declared class: derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words.
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Own site', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
Taking new people read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): RE-SOURCED FROM UNKNOWN: their own page, fetched this arc, carries an open application flow — the unknown resolved to taking-people on the source's own surface
Vehicle class read from the company's own page
category-vehicle-cascade (owner ruling 2026-08-25): CATEGORY DEFINITION — renting out what you own requires the asset, not a vehicle — by definition, EXCEPT where the asset rented IS a vehicle. Encoded at the category level by owner ruling; the record's own page remains the authority for everything else it states.
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase2 (owner arc 2026-08-25): restates this record's category-definition vehicle encode under the five-state model — the work is remote, listing-and-shipping, or hosting your own asset; no transport is part of doing it (the vehicle_tier claim remains the underlying source)
What it is read from the company's own page
debt-tranche2 (owner arc 2026-08-26): identity restated on their pages: P2P equipment marketplace across states (fetched 2026-08-26)
What workers rate the app reported by someone else — not the company's words
Google Play listing for "Rent My Equipment" — the store is the witness, not the company; one app serves both workers and customers, so the rating blends both; checked 2026-09-02
What you need read from the company's own page
debt-tranche3 (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own pages, fetched 2026-08-26: their own pages: 'List Equipment' with owner stories scaling 'his equipment rental portfolio' — you rent out equipment you own
Worker costs read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): DROPPED TO HONEST ABSENCE: the inherited value was an unproven promise; the 2026-08-25 search of their landing page plus the pricing/fees/FAQ/terms subtrees found no fee statement, and the record now carries the evidenced absence instead

See something wrong? Tell us.