The rating of the app workers use — never the customer app. Each store is its own witness; we show both and never average them. The count is what makes a score mean something. Click a listing to see the number as it stands today.
Apple App Store
Rover – Pet Sitters — 4.9 from 515,787 ratings — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
Google Play
Rover – Pet Sitters — 4.5 from 47.3K reviews — reported, not confirmed · checked 2026-09-02
One app serves both workers and customers here, so this rating blends both populations.
Where this came from
Where we got this
Site
Worker costs, exactly as our source recorded it
Profile/background check fee ~$25-35 — before-access, verify current
Every claim on this card, traced — 11 claims:
How you get in read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Site', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
How you get paid unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Verified-official). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
Local operating status derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words
mktcle-reclass (owner ruling 2026-08-26): STRUCTURALLY UNSOURCEABLE from provider property — companies do not state their metro lists, so no re-fetch can ever pay this claim. Reclassified out of the owed pile into the declared class: derived from our own coverage research, not from the company's words.
Sign-up link read from the company's own page
Record evidence_source 'Site', reviewed in the 2026-08-11 door-provenance audit and classified as the provider's own property
Taking new people read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own page, fetched this arc, carries an open application flow — the open door is the source's own word for taking people
Vehicle needed read from the company's own page
vehicle-model-phase3 (owner arc 2026-08-25, pages fetched 2026-08-25): their own flow includes 'a free in-person Meet & Greet' and in-person pet care; no vehicle requirement stated
What it is read from the company's own page
debt-tranche2 (owner arc 2026-08-26): identity restated on their pages: the pet-care marketplace (fetched 2026-08-26)
What workers rate the app reported by someone else — not the company's words
Apple App Store listing for "Rover – Pet Sitters" and Google Play listing for "Rover – Pet Sitters" — the store is the witness, not the company; one app serves both workers and customers, so the rating blends both; checked 2026-09-02
What you need read from the company's own page
debt-tranche2 (owner arc 2026-08-26): their own pages, fetched 2026-08-26: 'Complete the background check and an identity verification process'
Worker costs read from the company's own page
debt-paydown (owner arc 2026-08-26): the record's provider-cited cost detail carries the current story this field pointed at — re-sourced against that evidence (see worker_costs_detail)
Worker costs, in detail unproven — carried from an older research method and not yet re-read from a source
Inherited at the v8 migration from the record's evidence class (Verified-official). This claim does not yet say where IT came from; the record does.
You just opened their sign-up page. Was this one new to you? ✓ recorded
Optional. Answering doesn't affect the page you just opened.